|
Characteristics of Wakes in the Oceanwake hydrodynamics in the ocean |
| lab antarctica dome research resume software |
| Class | Speed, m/s (ONR) | Speed, m/s (Jane's) | Diameter (m) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles | 10 | 16 | 10 |
| Ohio | 10 | 12 | 13 |
These quantities imply typical Reynolds number values in the range of
Ocean shear values tend to be in the range Ri=(N/Uz)2={1,4}, although I can not find any references that claim this is true throughout the ocean. In other words, it's possible that these values are typical where people tend to measure ocean shear, and that might be biased toward regions of unusually high shear (and turbulence). It's possible that typical Ri values are smaller, e.g., under the ice in the northern polar region. I will update this when I learn more.
Re=UL/nu={10^7, 10^8} is hopeless for DNS at this time. O(10^5) is the best we can feasibly do.
We can simulate anywhere in the range subs operate, but lower Fr have wakes last longer, so interest us more. We will use Fr=100.
Fr = U/NL ->
N = U/LFr
Fr=100 implies Nsim=1/100=0.01. Note that this Nsim is in the non-dimensional units of the simulation, not cycles per second. This accounts for why this value of N appears to be larger than the maximum found in the ocean (N=0.001 Hz)... different units.
For us Ri sets the value of Uz since Fr effectively sets the value of N.
| Ri | = | (N/Uz)2 | -> |
| Ri1/2 | = | N/Uz | -> |
| Uz | = | N/Ri1/2 |
Choosing the strongest shear, Ri=1, yields Uz=N/1. Using N=0.01 implies Uz=0.01
I would bet that gradient Ri is probably not the important parameter; I suspect Uz/omega or non-dimensional vortex stretching determine the outcome.